“INSIGHT: Recent Supreme Court Decision Highlights Need for Tax Allocation Agreements,” Bloomberg Tax

“INSIGHT: Recent Supreme Court Decision Highlights Need for Tax Allocation Agreements,” Bloomberg Tax
29 May 2020

In an INSIGHT article published on May 26, 2020, by Bloomberg Tax, Mark E. Haynes spelled out his recent Supreme Court victory in Rodriguez v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and what the decision means.

The case raised the question: Should federal courts rely on state law, together with any applicable federal rules, or should they devise their own federal common law test?

The Court’s opinion noted that disputes between members of affiliated groups without a tax allocation agreement or with a contested one have been previously decided under a federal common law rule applied in some jurisdictions known as the Bob Richards rule. Generally, this rule provides that, in the absence of a tax allocation agreement, a refund belongs to the group member responsible for the losses that led to it.

Haynes writes… “for tax accountants the outcome is clear and straightforward: Affiliated companies filing a joint tax return should have a written tax allocation agreement.”

You can read Haynes’ Bloomberg Tax INSIGHT here.

Mark HaynesMark Haynes is a commercial litigation attorney at Ireland Stapleton Pryor & Pascoe. In his practice, he represents individuals, businesses, and political committees in matters involving all aspects of commercial litigation, including bankruptcy litigation. He can be reached at mhaynes@irelandstapleton.com or 303-628-3609.